On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Francis Giannaros wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2007 15:22:21 Rajko M. wrote: > > On Saturday 03 March 2007 09:02, Alberto Passalacqua wrote: > > > I'm a bit critical about the _one_day_ bug testing because I think it's > > > too short to examine the bugs of something complex like a distribution. > > > > While IRC meetings are cooncentrated they exclude all people that are not > > in right time zone. With present number of active users that is not good. I > > would prefer one thread on this list that will announce start of triage and > > than separate threads for each bug. > > That's an argument against a meeting _time_, but not really against a meeting > day. If it's a bug triage weekend (or any given couple of days), then > different people can be on at different times. And particularly on a weekend, > people's sleeping patterns vary quite a bit, so I don't think it's a problem. > > Like I said though anyway, this is a tried, tested and proven method: many > other projects have these, and they work tremendously well.
I like the idea, but I think it should spread over a couple days. Say a 48 hour period. Maybe a summary to the list. I have done projects via email where IRC did not seem to be possible. Good Luck, -- Boyd Gerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
