On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:40:28PM +1000, Horst Günther Burkhardt III wrote: > > Hey. It has come to my attention that the version of tla being shipped > > with openSuSE 10.2 and -factory is the same. Not only that, both are the > > same as the version that shipped with SuSE 10.0 - a shameful state of > > affairs. > > > > tla-1.3.3 is long deprecated, there is NO reason it should continue to be > > packaged with current distributions. I propose that OpenSuSE packages > > tla-1.3.5, which has been stable for quite some time. > > In such case (finding an outdated package), please just open an > Enhancement bugreport in bugzilla.
I can't! I don't have a bugzilla account and nor can I create one! tla has almost NO deps (in fact it only needs libc as i recall) and it could VERY simply be packaged by a person who knew how RPM worked. > > On tla related issues, would anyone like to binary package SXEmacs > > (http://www.sxemacs.org/) for OpenSuSE? (no, I'm not asking as an SXEmacs > > representative. it's just an idea.) > > Looks definitely suited for the openSUSE buildservice. :) I meant to be included in the default distribution, maybe someday even replacing XEmacs (the site has a list of things about SXE that are better than XE and I could probably tell you more) If people don't KNOW they have a choice, they won't EXERCISE their right to MAKE the choice. Surely you understand. > Ciao, Marcus -- /"Horst Günther Burkhardt III"-------------------\ | There's no place like localhost (127.0.0.1) | | http://peanuthorst.livejournal.com/ <- blog | \-----------------------------<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/
