On Mon, 21 May 2007, M9. wrote: > Well, since i have noticed the enormous difference in performance and > speed, i will allways use them, if possible. > I realy can not understand that this huge difference, between 1 large > partition and several smaller ones, is not noticed among you people.. > > If one would read the manual, that comes along with SuSE, it is
Uhh, there you got me. :-) > recommended to use partitions... > It is obvious, that those who write the manual, are not the same as > those who use the system... > > Maybe the absence of a good partitioner, is the reason, no one uses them;-) > > Clear to me is that the problems that arise now, are caused by the > absence of a good partitioner, and the knowledge, that a good > partitioner is a must, for those who take their OS serious, because even > M$ knows that it needs room to install, and offers all you need in a > simplyfied version of fdisk, to delete, make and format partition(s), as > many as you like. But afterwards, you are allways able to change the > size, delete, move or create new partitions, if there is the need for it. > > To partition, is the basis for a useable OS. > To be able to change the available room, is a must to keep the system tuned. > > I can not understand that this is not understood;-) All I need is a system partition for the os and a large data partition for me to create a mess. > Just imagine what happens: all files get all over the disk, which makes > a mess, and makes time to find the file you want longer. > Cann't you see this? Isn't that what's beagle for? No? :-) Steffen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
