Druid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> >
>>  please, This a about choice, there are two CD 1's each will take you to
>> the full installation of your choice. Each will also give you a fully
>
> If it was about choice, I demand the wmaker one cd, and the xfce one
> cd... Lets speak the english clear here, right? Lets not try to put
> smoke in the scene and do some doo-woop magic and say its about choice
> and bla bla bla. Cause it is not. Its a weight we have to carry, and
> its exactly the way Ive said.
>
> It is not about choice, its about having to have gnome. Again: there

Let me make perfectly clear that openSUSE is not a KDE distribution and
neither a GNOME distribution - it's a distribution for everyone.  It was
always a strong KDE distribution and continues to be so.  It always
contained both GNOME and KDE - and continues to do so.  I'm glad that it
contains now a polished GNOME as well as a polished KDE.

Our last survey showed that more than 20 per cent of our users choose
GNOME.  This is not the majority but a strong enough group that I will
not tread them as second class citizien as you suggest - and do not
consider them a "weight to carry".

We want to grow our distribution and therefore have to offer various
desktops to attract users.

It's not about having to have GNOME - it's about wanting to have the
best desktops environments to attract developers and users.

Btw. WindowMaker and XFCE users are far less and developers can create
their own one CD if they want - and make it available.

> is no reason to not have kde one cd as the first of the 5-dics set,
> and leaving gnome to the 2nd cd, except for the only reason I ahve
> cited. Its not about choice, its not about anything you have said.


Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
   Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgpIh4Ukn1XyM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to