On 31/08/2007, Christian Morales Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why to use sax2 -a? I have not tested it, but I suppose it will have his own > problems trying to find the best configuration automagically. To me the > Ubuntu way is better, give the user a failsafe GUI mode from where he can use > SaX2 with his GUI.
SaX2 will start its own X server. sax2 -a is probably not the best way. sax2 -rl is probably better (reinit detection database and use low resolution that should work on anything. Maybe -m 0=vesa too if we want to be really sure it'll work. The tricky bit is detecting whether X has failed to start, which I can't find a way to do with KDM at present. _ Benjamin Weber --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
