On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:47 +0200, Alberto Passalacqua wrote: > > That's ok, but it should have been clarified at the beginning of the > development stage, I think. Now, 17 days before the release, it is > probably too late to get them fixed for 2.20, which will be included in > openSUSE 10.3. > > Moreover, on what basis should we distinguish between GNOME bugs to > report upstream, and GNOME bugs to report on bugzilla? >
Since the number of bugs i see in opensuse 10.3 is quite high (and i am affected by at least 5 different _annoying_ bugs: g-p-m not showing suspend/hibernate for laptops, /dev/null permissions after hibernate, btdownloader not working, iwl3945 breaking suspend ... etc) i personally would like to see the release postponed rather then releasing something that you know won`t work almost perfectly (like 10.2 did). > With kind regards, > Alberto > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
