Peter Czanik wrote: > I tried to compile a package using current factory sources, and ran into > the following problem using lbuild: > > expanding package dependencies... > expansion error > nothing provides /lib/libreadline.so.5.2 needed by bash > nothing provides /lib/libhistory.so.5.2 needed by bash > > and it is actually right: > > pegasos0917:/data/10.3/suse/ppc # rpm -qp --provides > libreadline5-5.2-16.ppc.rpm > bash:/lib/libreadline.so.5 > readline = 5.2 > libhistory.so.5 > libreadline.so.5 > libreadline5 = 5.2-16 > > On the other hand 'build' can build the package from the same spec file. > It's just a lot more slow to start up, and inconvenient to use... Which > one is right? > > And a bonus question: is it worth reporting this dependency bug, now > that only critical bugs are fixed? Or belongs this to the critical > category? Even if it's not in factory, It certainly makes lbuild > useless, which is also used by the PackMan team... (actually, I ran into > the problem by trying to recompile a packman package for 10.3 on PPC).
Please file a bug and assign it to me. Please include more details how to reproduce. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
