Christian Boltz napsal(a): > +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | |SUSE |SUSE |openSUSE|openSUSE|openSUSE| | > | |LINUX |Linux |10.2 |10.3 |11.0 |Total| > | |10.0 |10.1 | | | | | > |--------------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+-----| ... > | YaST2| 862 | 1241 | 834 | 965 | 28 | 3930| 6) ... > 6) and 7) Did YaST and libzypp really have more bugs in 10.3 than in > 10.2? Or was there just more testing?
Hi, Honestly, the "product" entry is not important for developer. If a bug has been reported for 10.1 but fixed for 10.2 (as minor bugs sometimes are), it stays assigned to "10.1". There were more libzypp applications and their testing in 10.3 than in 10.2. Additionally, a lot of YaST bugs in 10.3 report "wrong dialog design", "wrong buttons used" etc. They're, of course, minor. Every statistic can be explained in many ways. For instance, does high number of bugs mean that testers do a good job finding and reporting them or does it mean that developers are doing more mistakes :) ;)? YaST is often used as a fallback solution-maker for bugs in other components. YaST does the installation and upgrade, so it can help to convert configuration files and other /non-/standard tasks. That might be also adding some more bugs to the YaST component. And last but not least, YaST and YaST Development is more known than in the previous releases. Our mailing-lists are open to the World. Our SVN is open, we have more developers and more YaST Modules than before. Have a nice day :) Lukas -- Lukas Ocilka, YaST Developer (xn--luk-gla45d) ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o., Lihovarska 1060/12, Praha 9, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
