Michael Wolf wrote:
MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's
still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory.
Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why it can be that it's
still old in Factory.
I would expect a policy that Factory should get necessary updates at
around the same time.
Yes, ideally it would be.
That's why I was asking for a policy so that I know it is taken care of
and it's just an oversight.
It was just an example that I know of but probably there are others.
What Factory are you looking at? I have 2.0.0.10 here
No, you are looking at Firefox ;-)
And even that is old, so what.
It's equivalent to 2.0.0.11, though.
Yes, agreed. I know that it is. But it still looks outdated from the
outside.
In my original post I didn't complain about Firefox, did I?
The example of Thunderbird was taken because it has known security
issues which are fixed already with a newer version. There are no public
security patches available for Firefox 2.0.0.11 or 2.0.0.10.
So that's the major difference.
The goal of that posting was not to blame Thunderbird (or Firefox) but
to make sure that someone is actually usually taking care of security
related stuff in Factory.
Wolfgang
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
