On Thu 01 Sep 2011 at 13:27:26 (-0300 UTC), Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:24:34 +0200 > Bjørn Lie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ma., 29.08.2011 kl. 17.22 -0300, skrev Marco Calistri: >>> Federico Mena Quintero ha scritto: >>>> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 08:26 -0300, Marco Calistri wrote: >>>> >>>>> Really also under KDE is possible to appreciate a slight >>>>> difference between Black tones: HTML message composing appears a >>>>> bit darker and brilliant than TXT one. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, IMO under KDE the difference is minor than GNOME: >>>>> >>>>> http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6203/6081964041_f54b3e40ff_b.jpg >>>>> (TXT) >>>>> >>>>> http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6191/6081963987_b1665c6b33_b.jpg >>>>> (HTML) >>>> .. >>>>> LXDE is not affected by hinting/antialasing, here the black is >>>>> as it should be! >>>> Hmm. So we still have the bug where the font rendering options >>>> are different in Gnome and KDE. >>>> >> snip >> >> Marco; are you using a freetype2 package that have subpixelpatch >> enabled? >> >> If not, try to rebuild it with that patch enabled, and let me know if >> that makes the black more to your liking. >> >> //Bjørn >> > I use the Subpixel ones from here; > http://pmbs.links2linux.org/download/Subpixel/openSUSE_11.4/ >
And which differences we could expect among the above repository and these ones below?: 1) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/muzlocker/openSUSE_11.4/ 2) http://repos.opensuse-community.org/subpixel/openSUSE_11.4/ ??? Are the related packages in sync or they differ so they are leading to a different desktop behaviour? Thanks. Cheers, -- Marco Calistri <amdturion> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
