On Tuesday 07 September 2010 21:10:49 Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:08:29PM +0100, Andrew Wafaa wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:52 -0700, James Mason wrote: > > > Considering how much we have contributed to the marketing of SpiderOak, > > > could someone talk to them about evening the score? > > > > > > "SpiderOak provides an easy, secure and consolidated free online > > > backup, sync, sharing, access & storage solution for Windows, Mac OS > > > X, and Linux (Ubuntu, Debian & Fedora)" > > > - https://spideroak.com/
The only page on the SpiderOak website, where openSUSE is mentioned is in the FAQ section. [1] (Open SuSE?) > > > > > > Small thing maybe, but since openSUSE is the only distro actively > > > promoting the use of SpiderOak (in contrast to Ubuntu's > > > self-promotion), we could be at least mentioned as a supported Linux > > > distro... > > > > > > - James M, 'bear454' > > > > I'm glad I'm not the only to have noticed the discrepancy :) > > > > I mentioned this to Henne just before 11.3 was released, and also > > mentioned that it would be a nice gesture by the SpiderOak guys & gals > > if they could redo their screenshots from Ubuntu to openSUSE. As far as > > I'm aware Henne has made the request to them. > > If not, we should just drop this binary thing again. > > Ciao, Marcus I think it would not be that easy. According to the SpiderOak page in the openSUSE wiki, it states that openSUSE users get a 15% discount, if you buy space from them. [2] So, there must be a deal or an agreement or something. What are the conditions for SpiderOak for promoting openSUSe, as stated in this agreement? [1] https://spideroak.com/faq/besides_debian_and_ubuntu_how_about_redhat_gentoo_open_suse_or_slackware [2] http://en.opensuse.org/SpiderOak -- Thoar Varenkamp Profile: http://en.opensuse.org/User:Thoar -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
