Am Freitag, 11. März 2011, 15:58:21 schrieb Vincent Untz: > Le vendredi 11 mars 2011, à 14:48 +0000, Nelson Marques a écrit : > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Untz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le lundi 07 mars 2011, à 19:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker a écrit : > > >> What´s the technology way we want do for the 11.4 successor? > > > > > > [...] > > > > > >> * KDE 4.x and GNOME 2.x _and_ GNOME 3.x > > > > > > I don't think the GNOME team has planned to have both GNOME versions. > > > If that's something people want to see happen, please show up at the > > > GNOME team meetings or on opensuse-gnome :-) > > > > I know the 'manpower' point of view, and against that there are no > > arguments. On the other side, considering that many people are > > throwing knifes at the alternative panels of G3 and stuff... > > gnome-panel is still available in GNOME 3 :-) So we can still build a > GNOME 2-like interface with GNOME 3 if we want. Some things will be > different, but I'm pretty sure those wouldn't be that much of a big deal > to most people. > > Vincent
Who cares about gnome anyway ;-) My experiences from KDE awere that it's good to keep support for the old stable tree in parallel for at least one version. The K Desktop (a really great product broken by an over-ambitious major release) is now in its 4.6 and it's slowly coming back to a stage where I would recommend it to grandparents and other casual users. This Gnome3 thing seems to be a big step for the little gnomies, so I think it's wise to let them choose if they want to make this step this time or next time. Are we sure we want this discussion on two lists? -- Ralf Lang Linux Consultant / Developer B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
