On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 21:37:26 Chuck Payne wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Bryen M Yunashko <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 20:00 +0100, Bruno Friedmann wrote: <snip> > > While I'm one of those who agrees we need to consolidate more of our > > lists, I am only in favor of merging similar-functioning. That is, I > > favor the merge of ambassador + marketing. > > > > I am not in favor of merging marketing with project. While there are > > times when some topics do overlap, in general, the definition of project > > and marketing are different and -project is much more related to the > > governance of openSUSE Project. > > > > Excessive consolidation will create too much noise, imo, and turn people > > off. > > > > Furthermore, you are posing this question to the marketing list only. > > If we are proposing to "move into another house", then shouldn't this > > question also be asked to the -project mailing list? Its only fair that > > they be asked too. > > > > Another thing, don't rely that people will follow a prefix-rule like > > "Ambassador: <subject-line>." It will never be consistent. > > > > And one final thing, some lists, and I believe -marketing is one of > > them, allow for people to send emails even if they are not subscribed. > > There are good reasons for that depending on the list's function. (I > > know artwork and news@ does this.) If we move to -project, do we > > re-define how people can send mails to -project too? > > > > Again, I agree with merging ambassador + marketing. I don't agree with > > marketing + project. That will be more harm than good. > > > > My two cents, > > Bryen M Yunashko > > openSUSE Project > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected] > > Bryen > > I agree with you > > Ambassador + Marketing that make the most sense.
Another +1 on that.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
