Dne pá 11. listopadu 2005 19:00 piotrek napsal(a): > > Well, I've checked this using amarok and the best benchmarking tool ever > known called "time" :)
*cough* > The results are: > > WITHOUT LDFLAGS: > > amaroK: [Loader] Don't run gdb, valgrind, etc. against this binary! Use > amarokapp. > QPainter::setPen: Will be reset by begin() > QLayout: Adding KToolBar/mainToolBar (child of QVBox/unnamed) to layout for > PlaylistWindow/PlaylistWindow > > real 0m3.879s > user 0m0.132s > sys 0m0.020s If you used /usr/bin/time instead of just bash's time, one of the additional numbers you'd get would be CPU usage. Which would be very low. Run 'LD_DEBUG=statistics amarok' several times, ignore the first result to avoid the effect of reading from the disk and use the average. Moreover, as the debug output suggests, it'd be probably better to use amarokapp. -- Lubos Lunak KDE developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
