Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > I'm using the build-script from Novell, which works quiet well. (the > one from the BuildService) > I'm running it on a x86-64 SUSE Linux 10.1 box for the moment. > > I have a directory setup of > > /var > | /buildrpms > | | /SL-10.2 > | | | x86_64 > | | | i586 > | | /SL-10.1 > | | | x86_64 > | | | i586 > | | /SL-10.0 > | | | x86_64 > | | | i586 > > and I switch base distro using the --rpms parameter. > > So basically, I would like to decide to build a package for 10.1 > x86-64, I do: > > build --rpms=/var/buildrpms/SL-10.1 --arch=x86_64 specfile.spec > and if I decide for 10.1 i586, I do > build --rpms=/var/buildrpms/SL-10.1 --arch=i586 specfile.spec > > Doing so seems to correctly define the architecture of the installed > rpms in the build root, but the resulting ELF binaries, in either of > these calls, result in being 64bit applications. > > Is my idea of the mainusage of the build script wrong or is it just my > usage of it? > Thanks for some help on this,
I guess it's solved if you start build with "linux32 build ..." If that's considered to be a hack or an official supported feature I don't know. It's also the way it's done within osc IMHO. Wolfgang --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
