Adrian Schröter wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 16:24:32 wrote Stanislav Brabec:
> > Here is a new version:
> >
> > - Fixed Requires x BuildRequires confusion.
> > - Support for "this new name is already used in this repository"
> > (by using "%if %suse_version foo || 0%{?opensuse_bs}")
> > - Support for fixes of "has choice for".
> >
> > AFAIK, with exception of Requires auto-editing and adding of %
> > debug_package, everything else is already supported outside spec files
> > in the BS config, so I plan to drop these functions soon and keep only
> > Requires editing.
>
> JFYI, the old package name should remain to work to avoid %if deserts in spec
> files.
It fixes only half of my problem - if package requires old name, but
there is only new one. It does not fix the case, it package requires new
name.
If I mirror only part of packages from Factory to GNOME:UNSTABLE BS, I
have no package providing libopenssl-devel. It can be fixed in
BuildRequires by BS config, but it cannot be fixed in Requires - nothing
in OpenSUSE 10.2 provides libopenssl-devel.
Only automatic collection of devel dependencies or a compat package can
fix it without %if deserts.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
