>>> On 04-06-2007 at 13:35, Steffen Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah yes. Seems to be a rule that's really urgently needed. > > While I agree that the mentioned scheme makes a lot of sense for, e.g, > libdb, I can't see any practical value in forcing it on existing packages. > > > Steffe
Well, the question ought to be: what harm does it do if somebody anyhow working on a package just implements the new rule on it? I know that way of following rules: 'it does no harm to anything if I don't folloow it and it was just easier to do it otherwise'. It might not be a high priority task.. but the time is not worse invested than discussing about it forever... Regards, Dominique TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 72 offices in 56 countries and over 2,000 professionals (February 2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
