Hello, On Jul 31 13:45 Marcus Rueckert wrote (shortened): > i dont see an issue of having a documentation packaging around that > carries all used licenses. as a comparison: should an RFC package only > install the files, which contain infos about my installed services?
Don't mix up usual documentation with legal stuff. A package license file is not just "documentation". Often a license file is a contract between the user and the manufacturer of the software. I don't know (IANAL) what it means from the legal point of view if such a contract is installed but the associated software is not, e.g. when the contract or license talks only about "the software". Again and again: This is not a technical issue. It is a legal issue. Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany AG Nuernberg, HRB 16746, GF: Markus Rex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
