* Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-02 16:39]:
>
> On Sep 2 2007 15:24, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> >> I really question the weirdo move (but only for the .so files) to
> >> /usr.
> >
> >That's not the question here. 10.3 has moved GNOME to /usr, and
> >additional packages have to honor this (or do you really want a full
> >/opt/gnome tree only for one addon package?).
>
> Define 'full'.
All top-level directories.
/opt/gnome/bin
/opt/gnome/share
/opt/gnome/lib{,64}
That only for some addon packages and the basic GNOME in /usr? What's
the benefit beside of confusing the user? What's if /opt/gnome/bin is
not in $PATH any more after a transitional phase? Same for the linker
cache. /opt/gnome will be gone, and the same for /opt/kde after KDE4
is stable.
Thanks,
Bernhard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
