On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:37:28PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> That is how the new scheme was designed. If libelf0-devel and
> libelf1-devel conflict then the name libelf-devel should have been kept.
> (Of course there are some internal problems with that, in case both
> libelf versions are in a single build repository. This may be the
> reason of the differing names.)
>
> Btw, I only see libelf0 in 10.3.
But you can't know in advance if some other version will conflict
or not, can you? So shouldn't it be libelf-devel until you know
that different versions do not conflict?
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
