On pátek 30 listopad 2007, Dan Stromberg wrote: > We have a product with versions like: > > 3.0.1-dev > 3.0.2-rc2 > 3.0.2.5 (for a customer version) > > ...etc. > > As I'm packaging these as RPM's, we've been trying to do: > > %define major 3 > %define minor 0 > %define patchlevel 2 > %define relnum rc2 > > > ...but is that going to confuse rpm? That is, is relnum going to be > compared numerically or as an ASCII string, or as something else? > > How can we ensure that dev < rc2 < 5 for relnum? Do we need to come up > with a numbering scheme like "dev is 0-20, rc is 21-40, customer > versions are 41-60" etc? > Yes, converting everything to numbers is probably the most safe way. Some project use something like 3.0.99.2 for 3.1-RC2.
-- Vladimir Nadvornik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
