On 07.02.2014 09:53, Stephan Kulow wrote: > On 07.02.2014 09:37, Sascha Peilicke wrote: >> On Friday 07 February 2014 08:28:38 Stephan Kulow wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Now that Klaus' ruby merge is done, I switched the OBS project >>> to use it - as a test bed of a "product". It's plain impossible >>> to keep yast and update OBS on 13.1 ;( >>> >>> We have several things required by yast >>> >>> libruby2.0.so.2.0 is required by yast2-ruby-bindings and libstorage-ruby >>> ruby(abi) == 2.0.0 is required by rubygem-ruby-dbus and rubygem-fast_gettext >>> >>> So not to break yast the OBS "product" needs to provide at least 4 >>> packages linking against ruby 2.1. The libruby2.0 problem will be gone >>> for future updates as we now have libruby2_1 as a special package, but >>> the ruby(abi) problem will stay and as I said before: making >>> /usr/bin/ruby an update-alternative is only a solution as long >>> as rubygem-fast_gettext isn't required by OBS with a different >>> ruby abi. >> >> Couldn't you switch to plain rubygem-gettext? I guess it's only a transitive >> dependency anyway since I can't recall a German OBS :-) >> > OBS does not gettext at the moment, no. But software.oo does for example > and we won't be able to hold yast on the VM running software.oo soon ;(
... if deployed from packages - deploying our rails apps (including OBS) the "bundler/rvm way" is of course a valid option if we can't replace ruby. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
