On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:32 +0800 Sascha Peilicke <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday 28 February 2014 15:29:06 Josef Reidinger wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:16:56 +0800 > > > > Sascha Peilicke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thursday 27 February 2014 19:00:43 you wrote: > > > > * Sascha Peilicke <[email protected]> [Feb 27. 2014 16:55]: > > > > > Also, there are still some other OBS projects that are in deep red > > > > > after > > > > > the very agile ruby changes (systemsmanagement:chef/crowbar). > > > > > > > > Indeed, the project setup for systemsmanagement:chef:master seems > > > > broken since many rubygem packages fail for openSUSE_Factory while they > > > > succeed in d:l:r:e > > > > > > It broke because the whole of devel:languages:ruby{:backports,:extensions) > > > was changed by you. You wanted to get your SLE12 feature in and I'll bet > > > a beer you'll silently disappear just after SLE12 goes GMC. > > > > It is not about SLE12 at all. It is about getting ruby2.1 into opensuse. > > Problem is that it change some locations and we want to be better prepared > > for future. It also reflect that opensuse support in one release one ruby > > version. > > Which was decided by whom again? see whole discussion at this mailing list about ruby 2.1. You can speak up anytime - http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-ruby/2014-01/msg00000.html and http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-ruby/2014-01/msg00036.html I do not see any issue that cause problem to opensuse. Just that SUSE cloud can have problem with single ruby version in distro and I am still not convinced that it really will have it. Josef P.S. no need to CC me, I am on the list -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
