On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:38:26 +0200 Klaus Kaempf <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Adam Spiers <[email protected]> [Apr 30. 2014 00:41]: > > > > This looks like a fundamental limitation of rpm's version > > requirement system, and I can't think of a good workaround right > > now :-/ > > A proper fix has to wait for the next version of rpm which is supposed > to support boolean expressions in dependencies. > > See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fz4GJnFokso > > Klaus Well, it is teoretically correct, but practically not. I think version with conflict is fine, just result is that you cannot have simulatneous installed more gems, which is drawback. So when new rpm is released and we know in which version, then gem2rpm can create conditional conflict. Josef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
