On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:01:47 +0200
Cornelius Schumacher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2017 M06 28, Wed 14:58:33 CEST Marcus Rückert wrote:
> >
> > as the ruby maintainer i can recommend this way if you can't live
> > with versioned binaries.
>
> The problem with versioned binaries is that it's incovenient to type,
> and more importantly that all documentation, examples, snippets,
> scripts you can find out there are assuming non-versioned binaries.
> It would be nicer to have a way to work with Ruby which works out of
> the box for everybody.
I really hope that having to call a binary with a slightly different
name is something that the average developer can do.
And as i said this only affects a few very core binaries. all our
rubygem rpms are using update-alternatives.
> > As Josef pointed out already do not change the system ruby.
>
> Might it be possible to make YaST use a versioned version of Ruby, so
> that the system Ruby would be a bit more flexible?
Sure. Will you and your team help with the work and the maintenance
to keep it working in the long run?
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
