My question is. Microsoft supports these KVM, VirtualBox for their windows servers?
IMHO, I believe this would be a good point, especially because today, we have no more only windows, neither only Linux, in 99% all datacenter are heteregeneos plataform. If Microsoft not endorses KVM, Virtual Iron, VirtualBox.... our way to achieve any related mission on virtualization will be quite harder, because most guys use virtualization to play Windows too. >>> Alexey Eremenko <[email protected]> 28 Junho, 2010 >>> Well, quite interesting Actually besides SUSE, I think Debian is the only distro packaging Xen Dom0 kernels nowadays. (Mandriva has older Xen Dom0 kernels, not sure about Ubuntu) ofc. Red Hat supports Xen fully in RHEL 5, but this won't be in RHEL 6, where Red Hat migrates to KVM. as for OSS Virtualization in general - both KVM and VirtualBox do a wonderful job for a lot of people. Xen's main advantage over others is Linux-over-Linux in PV mode... for which OpenVZ can be used just as well... If I were to create an OSS virtualization solution, I would go for OpenVZ for Linux-on-Linux approach, and VirtualBox for all the rest needs. -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
