Jan On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 07:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > There's no clear plan here yet. To date the list of missing features is > still too long for me to drop my resistance to that step, and the rate > of regressions introduced upstream is still too high.
Noted. Here, support for passthrough (pci, usb, etc) and 'legacy' CPU without hardware/svm were concerns. Need to catch up to see if they still are ... I've tried !*suse OS with Xen on pv-ops a few times in the past year, with varied results. Nothing's ever been anywhere close to Suse/Xen's production-stable operation. Could be my config, of course, but I'm not convinced. > The good news here is that PV spin lock work has been resumed upstream > recently, > after having been stalled for a couple of years. Missed that ... thx for the heads-up. - ar -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
