Per Jessen wrote: > Per Jessen wrote: > > >> My xen host is openSUSE 13.2. >> >> I have one guest running currently. I created a second guest to >> install 13.2 and ran "xl create". >> >> This appears to have brought down the interface (vif10) for the >> existing guest ?? >> >> 9: vif10: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN >> group default qlen 512 >> link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >> >> > > I'm not certain but this seems to be related to me having chosen "vif10" > and "vif11" as the interface names. On a second try, when I omitted > the interface name for the new guest, the new interface was > named "vif11.0" and did not interfere with vif10.
I don't see your problem on an updated 13.2 Xen host. I started two PV domains with 'vifname=vif10' and 'vifname=vif11' in their respective 'vif = [...]' config. The vif device of the first domain (vif10) remains up and continues to work when starting the second domain containing vif11. Are your domains PV or HVM? Can you provide the vif config for the domains? Does /var/log/messages contain any hint about who (or what) is bringing down the vif? Regards, Jim -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
