On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:56:15AM +0200, jdd wrote: > >Novell decided to behave as a benevolent dictator, i.e. > >that Novell reserves the right to decide on all as a last > >resort, but attaches a great importance to work of the > >users and volunteers. > > > >In practice, it is very rare that a page written by a > >volunteer is erased or modified by an employee of Novell > >and, during this first year of operation (2005-2006) one > >could reproach Novell for being long in implementing > >certain decisions (the means are limited), but not to > >censure the volunteers.
<snip> > I don't think it's the place to state that The community is > large and include many Novell employees, may be enhance the > relevant page It could be interpreted that every change that is done by Novell is because it was a decision from Novell, while almost always it was the openSUSE member doing the change. And he just happens to work at Novell. -- houghi http://houghi.org http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/ http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > > Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
