On 7/12/06, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Rajko M wrote:

> It is obvious that I was upset with speed of "contributions" and lack of
> reactions form mentioned user. That is probably main reason to come here
> and ask, what is appropriate, and how to act in similar situations.

there are some obvious situations. I noted yesterday (for
the first time) a modification in english on the communicate
page of the french wiki. I reverted it (only a sysop can do)
immediately. However I couldn't set up a comment for the
revert (may be I did something wrong) so I added a comment
on the user discussion page saying that no english notice
sould go on a french wiki :-)

> Probably is time for another addition to policies and guidelines that
> will regulate how to act if new user doesn't pay attention to messages
> on his discussion page, removes "delete" template and continues with
> "contributions".

if you look at the number of red links in the user list, you
will understand that most user don't understand the
mediawiki way of life. This can be understood.


Mediawiki way of life? Anyway its a subscription based service to deliver
info, if you expect everyone that come in there to activly participate we
would be in deep shit with the number of crap that would came out, let alone
all of them filling a profile for an account they might use once or twice
... See what happen when they start to really try and use it ..

may be the sysop should have access to the user e-mail
(given at subscribtion time) to be able to notify such
actions directly.


It's not like if all the WikiSysop were trustable ...
Ho wait its just a scam to get a fat list of email to go sell to canonical
right ?


> Delete was drastic, but parallel free support for enterprise product on
> openSUSE is not something that helps Novell. It competes with payed
> support, and cuts the branch that we are sitting on :-|
>
not necessarily. If comercial actions take place around
opensuse, this strengthen opensuse. Nor Novell nor OpenSUSE
can give all solutions, being part of a more complete system
is good.


Well talking about the commercial version, why are you gonna buy it if not
for support? Anyway openSUSE wiki is way out of place for that, this IS NOT
your personal paste bin, even less a place to spam publicity.

personnally I am in favor of listing of commercial
applications relevant for us, even comments.

I only asks the comments to be wiki way, that is as factual
as possible, no advertisement nor non fact based advice (no:
"the best of all products", but yes for "This product is
fine for my home made photographs...")

bit for the latter, we can trust the users (the many users).


Huh ??
-Trust is a weakness

Reply via email to