Hi,
On Tuesday, September 06, 2005 at 13:28:38, Andreas Simon wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 September 2005 13:02, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> > No need for yet another bugtracking system. We already have a bugzilla
> > up dont we? :)
>
> Yes, but is Novell willing to use this for all the contributer's packages? We
> will see. For example Ubuntu's bugzilla is only for their supported main
> packages. Other packages (their universe and multiverse repositories) have a
> seperate bug-tracking system, they don't allow them in their main bugzilla.
I dont see a reason why we wouldnt allow that. (NOTE: im not involved with
decisions about bugzilla in any way)
> > You are showing the classical reflex when it comes to this topic ;) You
> > immediately invent a "inner circle" of people that decide whats good and
> > whats bad. I understand that, that is my first reflex too. But thinking
> > about it, that approach has a lot of disadvantages.
>
> Yes it's the standard way of many projects. If there's an other way were it
> is
> still possible to maintain a high quality, well then even better. :-)
Thats exactly what we should try to find out together! Is there an
other way were it is still possible to maintain a high quality?
Henne
--
Henne Vogelsang, Subsystems
"Rules change. The Game remains the same."
- Omar (The Wire)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
