Hi,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg schrieb:
Exactly; it would force the server to behave like with "--checksum" even
if the server has disabled it.
Except that it needs fewer processor cycles. But I see your point
about server IO bottlenecks.
Why does it need fewer processor cycles?
Have you ever seen a pure file server where processor usage is the limiting
factor?
Yes; just think about Linux NFS...
Or an FTP daemon which allows ASCII mode downloads or "get
directory.tar.gz" tar-and-gz-on-the-fly...
Or just rsync with --checksum.
But I second your first question.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
