Pascal Bleser wrote: > Per.. so much bashing, so much negative energy ;)
OK, point taken. I'm actually trying to restrain myself, but I just don't seem to have gotten many good understandable answers. What I've written should most definitely _not_ be seen as negative, but just as criticism. Hopefully even a little constructive. > It was quite clearly stated from the beginning that 10.0 was an intermediate > release, > with all of the "openness" of [open]SUSE not being effective just _yet_. I wasn't aware of that, but I can fully accept it. I don't mind being told to sit down for now, it's the lack of reasoning I'm having a problem with. > bash bash bash... please come down a little, being so overly fast in your > statements > without discussing just doesn't prove helpful to anyone.. I did say "I can't help it" - obviously my humour doesn't work everywhere :-( > There is *always* a package maintainer, and she's responsible for providing > good > quality, not letting "anything" in. That's not going to change, at least > let's hope not > ;) Oh no, I absolutely agree. I was just disagreeing with the idea of not letting something "in" only because "we don't want to support it". > I don't see the package maintaince been given out of hands by the SUSE > developers /for > packages that make it into the boxed set and SLES/. > This is understandable, and one might argue this is not "open enough"... For the retail set and SLES, entirely reasonable. For openSUSE, not quite. In my opinion anyway. /Per Jessen, Zürich --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
