Hi,
what the fuck are you (opensuse) doing to me...
The next time I will be classified "unknown" I will make myself unknown
here...
Cheers -e
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Mail Delivery System wrote:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EEz4y-00024X-EK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:55:22 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:55:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (fwd)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Level: /
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required
X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie
Hi,
what (the fuck, really!!) is going on there?
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:48:31 +0200
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EEyyM-0000vY-4G
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:48:31 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:48:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (fwd)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Level: /
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required
X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie
Hi,
crazy. But let's see if I can post it in the end...
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:30:31 +0200
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EEygw-0006Td-1m
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:30:30 +0200
X-Return-path: <>
X-Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26])
by mailbox.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1EExZE-0005GE-Jc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:28 +0200
X-Received: from lists.suse.de ([195.135.221.131] helo=lists.suse.com)
by mailer.gwdg.de with smtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1EExZD-0001jm-Sf
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:28 +0200
X-Received: (qmail 9922 invoked for bounce); 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
Date: 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
ReSent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:30:13 +0200 (CEST)
ReSent-From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ReSent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReSent-Subject: failure notice
ReSent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Level: /
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.2 points, 6.0 required
0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at lists.suse.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ezmlm-reject: fatal: List address must be in To: or Cc: (#5.7.0)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 9918 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Relay2.suse.de) (195.135.221.8)
by 0 with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
Received: from Relay2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD8725B8D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Relay2.suse.de ([127.0.0.1])
by Relay2.suse.de (Relay2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP
id 20605-06 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx2.suse.de (ns2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C4425BC6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailer.gwdg.de (mailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.26])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B911BB25
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EExZA-0001j5-Q1
for [email protected]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:25 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:16:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christopher P Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [opensuse] opensuse wlan
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
ReSent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:22 +0200 (CEST)
Resent-From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
ReSent-Subject: Re: [opensuse] opensuse wlan
ReSent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Christopher P Robbins wrote:
Quoting Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Helmut Seidel wrote:
this weekend i tried opensuse rc1 - everything looks fine but I cannot
connect to the internet via my wlan. I had the same problem with 9.3 but I
could solve this by deleting my ethernetcard in yast. In rc1 I cannot
delete
the ethernetcard. If I click on delete the card does not disappear, it
simply is markedt as "unconfigured" and that doesn't help (at least on
suse
9.3) - is there any way to delete the card?
"Not configured" in YaST is meaning "not disturbing anything else", so
you should have a closer look at your wlan interface.
And at least you need to tell what it is - your wlan interface - if you
like to avoid 1000 good, but non-relevant answers here. You should
struggle to avoid that.
Wireless has been (at least for me) a mess. I've had so many problems with
all the available drivers (lucky for me, I have a Broadcom card :( ),
from Linuxant to ndiswrapper, and NONE of them have worked at all.
Same here. Ndiswrapper is not 64-bit-aware, Linuxant does not work yet
with my Inprocomm W$-only device (stated by Jonathan - I have an implicit
Linuxant license due to /usr/src/linux/CREDITS).
At least for now, I'm resigned to the fact that wireless is non-functional
until after the release canidates, if at all. (And yes, I've reported
through Bugzilla and my driver provider - nothing has resulted from
going through either of these channels).
I have resigned, too, with my built-in device, but only regarding
ndiswrapper and linuxant. My first workaround was to use a Ralink RA2500
pc card (worked out-of-the box with all betas), but because I want to use
802.11a to get rid of microwave, DECT telephone and "wireless TV"
interferences, I use Atheros pc cards now. I know I need the non-OSS
package
/pub/suse/i386/10.0/SUSE-Linux10.0-RC1-Extra/kernel-modules+firmware/suse/x86_64/kernel-default-nongpl-2.6.13-8.x86_64.rpm
for it, but with "rpm -Uhv"'ing it separately during the YaST2 updating
phase, it continued working thru the whole beta phase.
But as Eberhard said, give us a better description of your device and what
the problems are and maybe we can lend a hand....
Maybe the helping answer is above, but maybe it is only one of 1000
useless answers as long as there only is a cry, not a description.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
