Looks like we have different experiences regarding 9.3. I was quite happy with performance and hardware recognition between 9.2 and 9.3 Even though I'm Swedish myself, I would never install an OS (or any software on top of that OS) in Swedish myself so I haven't experienced some of your issues. The good thing is that we have bugzilla.novell.com to report these things so if you ever feel that SUSE Linux doesn't perform, doesn't translate or doesn't do what you want, please go there and file a bug report so that we can fix the issues. We can only fix issues we know about :)
Cheers, Magnus >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 9:19 pm, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have been running every other release of suse since 6.4 and the > quality, stability and language support for Swedish (my natural > language) has improved ever since but the step from 9.2 to 9.3 broke > that trend. It's not bad compared to others but compared to previous > releases of SuSE it was a dissapointment. It felt like the hardware > support compared to 9.2 was worse and some of the Yast modules had > annoying bugs in them. I ran every release between 8 and 9.3 on the > same laptop and the 9.2 release worked best for me. Now that I bought > a new laptop I didn't want to go as far back as 9.2 and my experience > with 9.3 wasn't so good so I gave 10.0- RC1 a shot. And so far all I > can say is that SuSE is back on track. I know there is a lot of stuff > to be translated to Swedish but that is such a small language so I > won't complain but the hardware support and stability is far better > than 9.3 > > 2005/9/21, Magnus Boman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> What was the disappointment? I've been running 9.3 on my laptop since it >> was release and I've been happy with it. >> >> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 9:03 pm, in message >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote: >> > I sort of agree. I bought 9.3 when it was released but it was a >> > disapointment. I bought a new laptop last week and didn't even >> > consider installing 9.3. I installed 10.0 RC1 and so far it works >> > better than 9.3. I don't know if I'll have to reinstall once 10.0 >> > stable gets released but as said before installing 9.3 wasn't even >> > considered. >> > >> > 2005/9/21, Pal, Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > RC1 means it is unfinished. I would never run an RC1 on a system >> that needs >> > to stay up. Either run 9.3 or wait or if your system is runnming now >> and does >> > what you want it to do, stick with that. >> >> >> >> 9.3 is sux... It looks like 10RC or Super10 RC is better choice >> >> >> >> L: >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e- mail: opensuse- [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e- mail: opensuse- [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e- mail: opensuse- [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e- mail: opensuse- [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Peter Magnusson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://crippledcanary.se > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e- mail: opensuse- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e- mail: opensuse- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
