I think the naming (in many areas) could have been done better by Novell and openSUSE.
The last thing you want is to have people confused about your product. It is mostly due to inconsistent naming and usage, and it must be fixed for future releases. 1. Why introduce a release version of "GM" when the roadmap calls it "Final"? 2. The label of "Evaluation Edition" is confusing. Is this version only good for "Evaluation"? Clearly not. And what does this sentence mean on the Novell site: "Alternatively, download the Eval DVD ISO image. It includes an installable evaluation version that can be later upgraded to the complete product.". What exactly do I require to upgrade if I install this edition?? 3. OSS - we have covered this before, but my own belief is that SUSE Linux OSS should be renamed to openSUSE Linux. And I am not the only one: http://www.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_&_SUSE_Linux_confusion And to finish with a quote from myself. On Sunday September 11 2005 8:39 am, Peter Flodin wrote: > The confusion will just get worse if we don't fix it now. Pflodo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
