Randall R Schulz wrote: > In all likelihood, the activities during system > start-up are not characteristic of those performed during normal > operations.
True, but if the mere usage of ReiserFS slows down things by 23 seconds on my box, don't you think there is _something_ wrong here? That is a 40% difference! And assuming that the system also does lots of non-fs stuff during boot, the performance difference is probably even higher. Maybe ReiserFS is not a good choice for small partitions (my 4GB is rather small, nowaday), or it is not a good choice on laptops, or Suse sets something up incorrectly, or whatever. I think it would be really interesting to find the answer to this question. Regards nordi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
