On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Allen wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:24:40AM +0100, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > Aschwin Marsman wrote:
> > > As a pine user on SUSE 10.0 I have the following version installed:
> > > > rpm -q pine
> > > pine-4.63-9
> > > 
> > > On the pine site it states:
> > > 
> > > Note: Install Pine 4.64, or later version, to fix a buffer overflow 
> > > problem. Read iDEFENSE Security Advisory for full details.
> > > http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=313&type=vulnerabilities
> > > 
> > > Will pine be upgraded to 4.64 or is this already solved in 4.63-9?
> > 
> > Since you specify the mailbox names you want to use in your client
> > yourself you would only be able to exploit yourself which is
> > pointless. So no need for an update.
> 
> SUSE team is one of the biggest reasons I use SUSE, you guys have proven to
> me over and over, that you not only know what you're doing, but you're
> great at what you do.

That's correct Marcus and friends are doing a great job. But when you are
looking at e.g. the lwn.net securiry page SUSE isn't always that quick, it
seams that ubuntu is the fastest in general.
 
> Any other distro would probably make a big deal about this telling users to
> upgrade soon. You guys understand security and know it isn't anything.

It would be nice to have a list of security flaws with those reasons included
e.g. on the openSUSE website: we looked at these flaws, we will solve the
following, we won't solve these others because... and than give the reason.

I saw Linus Torvalds (a pine user also) upgraded to the latest version.
As a user you don't want to read all security reports, I only follow the
most important ones for the tools I use daily.

Also other bugs are fixed, e.g.:

* Crash with malformed mailbox name that allows an authorized user
  to run commands from the shell
* When a PC-Pine network read, or a non-SSL Unix Pine network read
  took longer than Tcp-Read-Warning-Timeout (default 15 seconds)
  Pine would always time out instead of allowing the user to
  continue
* Bug when setting Reply-Indent-String to the Empty Value. Quote
  showed up as a double quote instead of as nothing.
* Crash when Pine attempts to open a remote (IMAP, POP3, NNTP)
  mailbox specification that has an unterminated quoted string in
  the network part of the name
* Sorting by Score would not work after changing a message's score
  by setting a keyword or changing its status
* Crash when adding then deleting the first header color
* Crash when Bouncing a message and then selecting the address to
  bounce the message to using ^T and the directory server screen
* When exporting a flowed message, perform wrapping to get rid of
  long lines and space stuffing
* Incorrect MESSAGE INDEX when message contains some high-bit
  characters (do a better job of ensuring that control characters in
  a message don't reach the screen by mistake)
* Limit amount of delay that can be caused by the system clock
  jumping backwards
* Bug that caused confirmation prompt to be skipped when Apply
  Saving messages with the first message in the set not having
  deleted parts
* Allow commas in Customized-Hdrs fields and in header fields
  defined in Roles
* When two Pines were accessing the same address book and the two
  Pines had different ideas of how it should be sorted, they could
  get into a slow loop changing the sort order back and forth
  forever. Now give up and leave the sort alone after the first time
  this happens in a session.
* When Disable-Keymenu was set the "Other" subcommand did not work
  correctly in the Apply command
* When an address book contained multiple entries with the same
  nickname the ^T method of selecting always selected the first
* Crash when editing the first of two address book entries with the
  same nickname and changing the first from a single address into a
  list of addresses

Best regards,

Aschwin Marsman

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              http://www.marsman.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to