I hear you bruce. I dont know about SuSE being faster
than Solaris 10, unless you are using it for desktop
purposes. I have found Solaris to be darn quick and
beyond stable.
--- Bruce Ferrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Allen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 02:24:18PM -0800, Carlos
> wrote:
> >
> >>Why not run Solaris on it?
> >
> >
> > Because it's not as good as SUSE? Because SUSE is
> just as stable? Because
> > the Solaris Kernel developers are sometimes jack
> asses? Lol.
>
> Suse better be more stable :)
>
> And linux kernel devs aren't sometimes?
>
> How about I don't get nickle and dimed to death with
> linux... And it's
> faster?
>
> >
> >
> >>--- Bruce Ferrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Sun certifies SLES9 on it, but that's a bit on
> the
> >>>old side.
> >>>
> >>>Are there any known features that aren't
> supported?
> >>>
> >>>Has anyone done this?
> >>>
> >>>Any feedback on a possible load like this?
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
