On Monday 23 January 2006 18:43, houghi wrote:

Hi, 
> This part. A CD with stuff that is now only available via FTP.
>
> > Remember that because of the license of the software that would be on
> > that CD, you're not allowed to pull it from the internet, burn and
> > distribute it. IANAL but AFAIK you may only use that for yourself,
> > because you don't have a redistribution contract with Real, Adobe, etc...
> > I might be wrong though ;)
>
> No idea here. Hope Novell can enlighten us here. If you look add this as
> an ISO (perhaps not possible, but bear with me for a moment) one could
> download all 6 CD's, just CD 1 for basic install 1-3 for standard install.
> 1-3+6 for standard install pluss Java and stuff, 1-6 for full install.

That's exactely how it should look like for SL 10.1. CD 6 carries all the 
binary stuff.
>
> > No, no way, we *must* keep a 100% OSS version.
> > The typical Windows convert might not care about licenses (he probably
> > wouldn't have ever used Windows if he did) but many people do care about
> > it.
The OSS version stay as is.
Michael
>
> Seriously, how many people run their system without Java, because of the
> licensing? Just curious. As I stated I rather have a full boxed dual layer
> version and a OSS version.
>
> houghi



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to