[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What stands against the argument that your stats are no proof of quality is 
> the fact that (not only just in this example) it shows the posters I would 
> rate amongst the best in quality. :-)

The measurement of quality you have (quoting, ratio of added content)
isn't very good. I can give you many names who would score very highly
on that, but whose posts I wouldn't care too much about if they
disappeared completely (no names, no flamewars)

Please don't start a list police here


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to