On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:16:45AM +0100, David Haller wrote: > No. Except the correlations you can do, given the few datapoints available > (possibly aided by stats: number of posts, quoting-ratio, etc.). > > Give me a means to measure quality of mails, and I'm a happy bunny! I > guess that'd make SpamAssassin obsolete as well...
One could set up a voting system per thread and per users as to the value of each posting. You could even do a GAP reporting and look at who scored most similar like you did. There are several ways to measure qality and giving numbers to that. However you first must decide on whay quality is. Once you have defined what quality is, then you can start looking for a way to measure it. Well, in a way spamassasin IS a quality measurement. The question is naturaly if you want to give people a score or not. What if I get an extremely low score on general, because I bable too much and suddenly come up with one briliant idea? Would I be killfiled because I score so low? For each personaly a scoring system might be a nice idea. As everybody has its own idea about quality, it is something you need to do at home, not on the list. houghi -- Keep grandma off the streets -- legalize bingo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
