Pascal Bleser wrote: > The point is (again, I think I'm writing this for the 4th time or so): > when we say the 5 first CDs are "100% OSS", do we mean OSS as by OSI's > definition, or do we have our own definition of "OSS", like: "if we have > the source code and can redistribute it, then it's OSS" ?
I agree with what you write. And as it's very well said, could you paste this on a wiki page we could reference to later? this could also lead Novell to let go (if acvcording with it, what I think) or changing it is necessary. thanks jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
