Hi,
On Thursday, April 20, 2006 at 17:14:54, Christoph Thiel wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
> > > > Which makes me think that... err... once y2pmsh will really be dead
> > > > (i.e. non functional), y2pmbuild must be ported to something else.
> > > > To smart ? Or is there some form of CLI driven package installation
> > > > tool with libzypp ?
> > >
> > > y2pmbuild should be fully functional with the BuildRequires expansion
> > > stuff that went into build.rpm -- there is no real need to use y2pmsh,
> > > IIUC.
> >
> > Mmmmm.. not quite, as y2pmbuild uses y2pmsh to install missing
> > BuildRequires into the build chroots.
>
> Right, but that could be done by simple rpm calls + the BuildRequires
> expansion that comes with build.rpm! y2pmsh is only used to compute the
> dependencies, IIUC.
And for the repo handling. We just need uberbuild that incorporates all
features of y2pmbuild, build.rpm and the build service commandline
client. With the BuildRequires expansion we came a good step closer to a
unified (local) build tool. The rest should be pretty straigth forward.
Henne
--
Henne Vogelsang, Core Services
"Rules change. The Game remains the same."
- Omar (The Wire)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
