On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:21:05 +0200 (CEST) Christoph Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, SunSunich wrote: > > > > Yes, like that, but for whole system update. Actualy i forgot > > > > that such feature already used for online update. May be it > > > > will be not so hard to mirror that feature on System Update. > > > > > > I like that idea very much -- but it might not be as easy as it > > > seems in the first place ;) > > > > Actually we already talked about this a couple of months ago. I > > think it can be implemented by having a transport mechanism > > "drpmsync" next to "nfs", "ftp" and the like. I don't think it > > would be so hard to implement. > > Actually, I'd like to see "drpmsync over rsync", "drpmsync over ftp" > or "drpmsync over http", in order to spur the distribution of > drpmsync in general ;) > > Is it just a plan for future? Or it will be discussed in the "smart" branch? Could it be a project idea for SoC? I don't have a student status, but a friend of mine has, we could implement that feature for Yast System Update. All we need is a maintainer. Best regards, SunSunich aka Asa-Doo-Leen Saiid --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
