On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 01:57 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> The Tuesday 2006-05-02 at 00:49 +0200, Robert Schiele wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:28:07AM +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> > > It could be uncompressed, the differences applied, then recompressed with 
> > > something else - but then the checksum would be different.
> > 
> > There are more problems than just the checksum. Using different compression
> > would break the iso layout of the disc. Sure, you could have recreated this 
> > as
> > well but then what would finally be the point in distributing iso images at
> > all?
> 
> I mean that the checksum of the would be different, and this in turn means 
> that the iso would be different.
> 
>    I understand that applydeltaiso decomposes the iso image in the 
>    separated rpm archives; to each rpm it applies "applydeltarpm", 
>    generating a new rpm; finally, it collects all those new rpm in a new 
>    iso image, with the same boot image. The "iso" is generated anew.
> 
> However, considering that it takes 50 minutes times 5 disks = 4 hours 10 
> minutes to recreate the 5 CDs,

I used 5 konsole windows running concurrently to create the 5 CDs and it
took me 1.5 hours to create the new iso's. This is on a Xeon 2.4Mhz HT
with 768M of ram. Try running two concurrently sometime and see if it
runs faster.

-- 
Ken Schneider
UNIX  since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE  since 1998


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to