Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:05:58PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> 
>>> > Seems that you only fixed the issue but not the cause of the issue.  Now 
>>> > we
>>> > have ant-antlr-1.6.5-17.i586 but ant-1.6.5-16.noarch.
>>> 
>>> Is that a problem as well ? ;-(
>>
>> $ rpm -qpR ant-antlr-1.6.5-17.i586.rpm
>> ant = 1.6.5-17
>> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
>> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>> rpmlib(PayloadIsBzip2) <= 3.0.5-1
>> $ 
>>
>>> Oh shit :-(
>>
>> Some of your colleagues claimed that you have a script that automatically 
>> does
>> such dependency checks.  Either they all lied at me or you should actually
>> start using this script.
>
> Most of them are at Linux Tag right now ;-(.
>
> Have you noticed any other broken dependicies?

We just checked and did not found any other problems.

Thanks for reporting this,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgpPIqfEkvwlj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to