Hello, Am Freitag, 5. Mai 2006 23:48 schrieb houghi: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote: [...] > > BTW: The fact that nearly nobody noticed this yet shows that SUSE > > chose the least important packages to be FTP-only ;-)) > > Most likely because the DVD9 was not yet publicly available. Or am I > missing something?
No, you didn't miss anything. I don't have any DVD9 of 10.1 yet (but it was available SUSE-internally AFAIK). I asked AJ to send me the INDEX.gz of different media (including DVD9) to be able to do some comparison. The result was a small script to automate the comparison ;-) and 4 bugreports (two of them already fixed, the two below are still open/unclear). BTW: There were some FTP-only packages in 10.0 already, but the list was shorter - http://suse-linux-faq.koehntopp.de/q/q-suse100-ftponly.html (headlines in german, but the package list should be understandable for everybody ;-) > > Most of them should be available in "Extra" also - see > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166946 and > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166949 for details. > > If they are on the Extra (or CD6) they should be on DVD9 and DVD5 as > well. In general, yes - but note that not all packages in Extra are on CD6 and therefore probably not on DVD5 also. OTOH, some packages are on CD6, but not in Extra... Regards, Christian Boltz -- When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*". [Linus Torvalds] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
