-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

houghi wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:08:01AM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> <snip>
>> How about giving your opinion about the "really good points" in the
>> original posting ? Maybe it's still possible to not dismiss the whole
>> thread just because of that.
> 
> The good points are ignored, because otherwise you get a <ME TOO>
> mentelaty. The bad points are forcefully and arrogantly defended by you.
> So what do you want? That we just all happily agree with you?
> Or perhaps I am again too stupid and don't understand things.

I'd rather say you're manipulating. You're stating the total opposite of
what I wrote in my mails.

WTF are you trying to do ?

- --
  -o) Pascal Bleser     http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
  /\\ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEYSIur3NMWliFcXcRAhB1AJwOxbp/c9KSBUb/kLGxDeGpMDdHAQCgtd2G
LmsCbydVFrFMoqjJQtMz8Ec=
=skBT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to