Thomas Hertweck wrote: > Michael Loeffler wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I would like to bring in some facts into this discussion. >> >> [...] >> > > Thanks for that update! I would also like to provide some additional > facts ;-) One fact is that the name "registration" has been chosen very > injudiciously for such a process. With such a name, I think it was to be > expected that people would be suspicious and would have objections > against that process. Names need to be chosen very carefully because > people don't make up their opinion by looking at the actual process or > the real facts, they simply use whatever they associate with the term > "registration" - and in many cases, this association is quite negative. > So true... > But maybe Novell was already planning for the future and there is a good > reason for calling this process "registration"... ;-) > > Cheers, > Th. "But maybe"... Doubt?
FUD policies?? (Fear-Uncertainty-Doubt) More and more people seem not to want it anymore. Personally i do not. (Except if it would stand for "Friendship-Unity-Dialog") Cheers, PatrickM
